Alle afleveringen
196 afleveringen, van nieuw naar oud
-
146: Skills pay bills
27 december 2021 · 1 uur 10 min
We answer a series of questions from a listener on whether to start a PhD, what to ask potential supervisors, the financial perils of being a PhD student, the future of higher education, the importance of skills, what keeps us going, and more. Lees meer
Here are the specific questions that we answered in this episode (the background to these questions is shared in the episode):
Would you have any advice on how I can even decide whether to commence a PhD?
Are there any questions in particular that you think are important to ask prospective supervisors?
How do people make PhDs work financially? You are supposed to treat the degree like a regular 40 hour/ week job (and students commonly fail to do so). However, what full-time job pays ~$540 per week and expects this?! You are not supposed to work > 8 hours/ week outside of this?! I thought I could at least work 2-3 full days a week if I needed to.
Why do people generally leave academia, or not continue, after their PhD, despite obvious potential?
In what form do you think universities will be around in 5 and 10 years?
Are one-year progress reports from the PhD committee enough to stay on track?
What utility do PhDs hold inside and outside of academia? Apparently, skills matter more than a topic, and you have a better chance of getting a postdoc etc... if you have worked on a hot topic with a well-known supervisor.
How can one start the PhD prepared enough to finish it on time and earlier?
I am wondering what keeps academics going. I may be jaded, but lab environments don’t seem collaborative, and academics seem to be ruled by the admin people and hedge fund managers (or whoever). They also seem to make their money off students (i.e., the customer). I see a reverence for science and people trying to game the system, but not people wanting to seek truth in science. I now wonder how much of academia is motivated by pride, comfort, and not knowing what else to do. In my mind (and I am exaggerating a little), the PhD journ…
-
145: Our boat is sinking slightly slower
13 december 2021 · 48 min
We discuss the results from the cancer biology reproducibility project, the inevitable comparisons with reproducibility in psychology, and authorship expectations for posting public datasets. Lees meer
Links
The paper investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology
The paper on the impact of alphabetical order on career outcomes in economics (whose authorship order are determinedby alphabetical order
That human sports science paper that inlcluded a cranionotomy
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, December 13) "145: Our boat is sinking slightly slower", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/634QJ
-
144: The role of luck in academia
15 november 2021 · 54 min
If your child asked you whether they should pursue a career in academia, what would you say? We discuss this question plus three more quick-fire topics: the death of expertise, memorable presentations, and including internships in more graduate programs Lees meer
Links
Get a 30% discount on a Scite subscription for a year, just use the coupon code EVERYTHINGHERTZ via this link
The “Remind me of this later” twitter bot
The Chase, Chance, and Creativity book
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, November 15) "144: The role of luck in academia", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BKAH6
-
143: A little less conversation, a little more action
1 november 2021 · 55 min
Dan and James discuss the differences between 'talk' and 'action' in scientific reform and why reforms are taking such a long time to be realised. They also chat about whether messy (but correct) code is worse than no code at all, and revisit the grad student who never said "no". Lees meer
Other links
Get a 30% discount on a Scite subscription for a year, just use the coupon code EVERYTHINGHERTZ via this link
James' blog post on why he loves preprints
The grad student who never said "no" (archived) blog post
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, November 1) "143: A little less conversation, a little more action", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X75SZ
-
142: Red flags in academia [Live episode]
18 oktober 2021 · 57 min
In this live episode, Dan and James discuss red flags in academia, in terms of research fields, papers, and individuals. Thanks to everyone that participated in this live event! Lees meer
Links to stuff that was mentioned
Get a 30% discount on a Scite subscription for a year, just use the coupon code EVERYTHINGHERTZ via this link
The p-hacker app
Burro racing on Wikipedia
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, October 18) "142: Red flags in academia [Live episode]", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3YB47
-
141: Why we should diversify study samples (with Sakshi Ghai)
4 oktober 2021 · 57 min
We chat with Sakshi Ghai (University of Cambridge) about why we should diversify sample diversity and retire the Western, educated, rich, industrialized and democratic (WEIRD) dichotomy in the behavioral sciences Lees meer
Links to stuff we discuss:
Sakshi's piece in Nature Human Behavior
Many Labs 2 paper
The ‘helicopter' research piece
Joseph Heinrich’s recent book, The WEIRDest People in the World
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Music credits
Our outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 20) "141: Why we should diversify study samples (with Sakshi Ghai)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/J9E6W
Special Guest: Sakshi Ghai.
-
140: You can’t buy cat biscuits with ‘thank you’ emails
20 september 2021 · 1 uur 1 min
James proposes that peer review reports should be published as their own citable objects, provided that the manuscript author thinks that the peer review report is of sufficient quality and the peer reviewers agree Lees meer
Other links and things we discuss
An update on James’ start up job
The American service industry
Dan’s first outing since the pandemic started
The villlage of Hell, in Norway
The villiage of Fucking (now changed to Fugging) in Austria
The Hertz long term archive on Open Science Framework
We’re up for doing a syllabus episodes that you can assign to your classes
Dan’s recent piece in Nature Human Behavior on replication projects for undergraduate research theses
What about a replication study as part of a PhD thesis?
The trope of, “future replications are needed’
Collaborative Replications and Education Project (CREP)
Daniel Lakens mentioning that his paper might be the most cited Frontiers article ever
How thorough should peer review be?
James' new articles isn't online yet, but he will pin it to his Twitter profile as soon as it is
The Julian Koenig-led paper James mentioned (that Dan and James are co-authors on)
The Psychophysiology liviing meta-analysis article
Other links
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Music credits
Our outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 20) "140: You can’t buy cat biscuits with ‘thank you’ emails", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BW65N
-
139: Open science from a funder's perspective (with Ashley Farley)
6 september 2021 · 56 min
We chat with Ashley Farley about her background as an academic librarian, the underrecognised importance of copyright in academic publishing, and her work as a Program Officer at the Gates Foundation Lees meer
An academic librarian’s perpsective on the importance of open reseasch
The importance of copyright in research and what it means signing over your copyright
The PDF crisis!
What does a program officer at a grant funding organsiation do?
Why should funding organisations care about open science?
Why open access is more than just about acacemic papers, but extends to posters and presentations
Why can't academics collectively decide to push back against the big publishers?
The difference between private funders vs. goverment funding agencies
Other links
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Music credits
Our outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, September 6) "139: Open science from a funder's perspective (with Ashley Farley)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FQXSZ
Special Guest: Ashley Farley.
-
138: Preprints in the time of coronavirus (with Michele Avissar-Whiting)
16 augustus 2021 · 1 uur 7 min
We chat with Michele Avissar-Whiting about her role as the Editor-in-chief of the Research Square preprint platform and how she weighs up the benefits and costs of potentially problematic preprints during a pandemic. Lees meer
Notes, links, and stuff we cover:
The Journal Ghoul reference in the intro
Michele’s role as a the editor for a preprint server
How Research Square works
Weighing up the urgency of preprints vs. potential danger
The preprint-to- hype pipeline
The Scholarly Kitchen piece on knowledge democratization
Badges for preprints
The recent withdrawal of a preprint
Other links
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Music credits
Our outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, August 16) "138: Preprints in the time of coronavirus (with Michele Avissar-Whiting)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/AU8PW
Special Guest: Michele Avissar-Whiting.
-
137: Ten rules for improving academic work-life balance
2 augustus 2021 · 53 min
Dan and James share their thoughts on a recent paper that proposes ten rules for improving academic work-life balance for early career researchers and the figure from this paper that became a meme. Lees meer
Here are the rules:
Long hours do not equal productive hours
Examine your options for flexible work practices
Set boundaries to establish your workplace and time
Commit to strategies that increase your efficiency and productivity
Have a long-term strategy to help with prioritization, and review it regularly
Make your health a priority
Regularly interact with family and friends
Make time for volunteer work or similar commitments that are important and meaningful to you
Seek out or help create peer and institutional support systems
Open a dialogue about the importance of work–life balance and advocate for systemic change
Dan mentioned an app he sometimes uses to track his time, called Timery.
Other links
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Music credits
Our outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, August 2) "137: Ten rules for improving academic work-life balance", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7F3KN
-
136: Who peer-reviews the peer-reviewed journals?
19 juli 2021 · 50 min
We discuss Journal Reviewer (journalreviewer.org), which is a website that provides a forum for researchers to share and rate their experiences with journal's peer review processes. We also cover how some journals negotiate the way in which their impact factors are calculated. Lees meer
Links
The reference to James' mention of Dick Whittington
James’ RIOT science talk
Nichola's Raihani's tweet
https://journalreviewer.org/
The South Park Yelp episode
Other links
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Music credits
Our outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, July 19) "136: Who peer-reviews the peer-reviewed journals?", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5SH2Z
-
135: A loss of confidence
5 juli 2021 · 51 min
Dan Quintana and James Heathers chat about well-known psychology studies that we've now lost confidence in due to replication failures and the role of auxiliary assumptions in hypothesis-driven research. Lees meer
Other links
The reversals in psychology website
Anne Scheel and team's paper on whether you’re ready to test hypotheses
Homer Simpson burning bridges meme
The paper that suggests replications will make psychology too boring and nobody will want to study it
Daniel Lakens’ blog post on the hungry judges study
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Music credits
Our outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, July 5) "135: A loss of confidence", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/GHKRC
-
134: Paywalled questionnaires
21 juni 2021 · 57 min
We discuss a recent retraction triggered by the authors not paying a copyright fee to use a questionnaire (that also happened to be critical of the original questionnaire). Lees meer
Links for stuff that we mention:
The paper that was retracted for not getting the correct licence for a questionnaire
The retraction notice for this paper
The Spectrum piece that discusses this story
Why most online recipes begin with some ridiculous story
Libkey, which provides one-click access to papers via your institutional library subscription
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Music credits
Our outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, June 21) "134: Paywalled questionnaires", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/76KTY
-
133: Manuscript submission fees
7 juni 2021 · 49 min
Some journals use nominal manuscript submission fees to discourage frivolous submissions. However, it has been suggested that increasing submission fees could reduce article processing charges. Dan and James discuss this proposal, along with the recently released code of conduct for scientific integrity from the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. Lees meer
James’ Atlantic piece
Submission fees for mansucripts
The scholarly kitchen blog post
We have a new partner: Paperpile!
Our PeerJ episode with Jason Hoyt
The code of conduct for scientific integrity from the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences
Everything Hertz on social media
Dan on twitter
James on twitter
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on Facebook
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Music credits
Our outro music is by Lee Rosevere
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, June 7) "133: Manuscript submission fees", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5MAQN
-
132: Post-pandemic academia
17 mei 2021 · 51 min
Dan and James discuss how academia should operate in a post-pandemic world. What pandemic practices should we keep and what should we abandon? Lees meer
Links and details:
Quiz: Norwegian metal band or Norwegian town?
Things are slowly getting back to normal in some (but not alI) countries. So what academic practices and routines should we keep from the pandemic and what should we kiss goodbye?
Would it be possible to be physically located at your local university but to be employed/educated at another university?
Video abstracts are now an option is some journals, here's an example
Presentations might be more convenient online, but it's hard to replicate a good poster session
What is the actual point of academic conferences?
The neuromatch academy https://academy.neuromatch.io/
The neuromatch academy paper in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, May 17) "132: Post-pandemic academia", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FAU7Z
-
131: Long live the overhead projector!
3 mei 2021 · 1 uur 3 min
Dan and James answer listener audio questions on indirect costs for research grants, the mind/body problem, and why many academics aren't trained to teach. They also profess their love for the overhead projector Lees meer
Some more details:
Should we require universities to justify overhead costs, like heating and electricity?
Overheads can inflate the costs of grants, some grants provide an additional percentage for overheads but others don’t allow this, which can eat into grants
Get to know the people in your local grant office!
Indirect costs at MIT
A primer on indirect costs and why they are important to MIT
Does it matter that we address the mind body problem in psychology?
On the teaching of the history and philosophy of science (or lack thereof) in psychology courses
Why aren’t academics better equipped to teach?
The 3Blue1Brown YouTube channel
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, May 3) "131: Long live the overhead projector!", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8TFKC
-
130: Normalizing retractions (with Dorothy Bishop)
19 april 2021 · 1 uur
Dan and James chat with Dorothy Bishop (University of Oxford) about the importance of normalizing the retraction of scientific papers, publication ethics, and whether paper mills (companies that make fake papers at scale) are an issue in the psychological sciences Lees meer
Here are some links and stuff we covered:
Dorothy's thoughts on how the adoption of open science practices has been progressing since we last had her on the show in June 2018
The European Research Council's new open access journal, which is free to publish in if you're ERC funded
Dan's proposal of something similar in a 2019 The Chronicle piece (free to read with email signup)
Dorothy's recent blogpost on publication ethics
The Society for Microbiology piece behind the blogpost
Our episode with Elisabeth Bik
Image manipulation in scientific papers
Why don't publishers have agreements with authors that if they discover something dodgy in papers the author can't sue them?
Retraction notices don't easily discriminate between fraud and mistakes, and this is one reason why that authors are so reluctant to have their work retracted
James' fictional paper mill story (based on real fraud), that he wrote with Otto Kalliokoski
Are paper mills a problem in psychology?
Dorothy's Oxford photo challenge
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, April 19) "1…
-
129: Transparency audits
5 april 2021 · 57 min
Dan and James discuss the recently proposed "transparency audit", why it received so much blowback, and the characteristics of successful reform schemes Lees meer
The specifics...
The computational research integrity conference
The transparancy leaderboard proposed by Curate Science
Our episode with Chris Jackson, that James mentioned
What about a transparency leaderboard for instiutions?
What are the characteristics of grassroots reform schemes that worked?
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, April 5) "129: Transparency audits", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JRNP8
-
128: How do you generate new research ideas?
15 maart 2021 · 1 uur 11 min
Dan and James chat about how they come up with new ideas, why everyone seems to be trying to monetise their hobbies, and why it's so hard for most labs to have a singular focus of research. Lees meer
We had some problems with James' mic so the quality of his audio wasn't up our usual standard. To make up for this we've added one of our older bonus episodes at the end of this conventional episode (this begins at 54:18). These bonus episodes are typically only made available for our Professor Fancypants Patreon patrons, but now you'll get to hear one!
Other notes and links:
The half-serious "Highlander" bounty program from Noah Haber
The metapsy journal
How do we come up with new ideas?
What James watches and listens to in his spare time
The urge to monetise your hobby
The "Let's do nothing" kids book
"How to Do Nothing" by Jenny Odell
Robert Provine's Laughter as a scientific problem: An adventure in sidewalk neuroscience
The value of including many experiments in a single paper
Is there too much reform happening in psychology?
Clubhouse and the new twitter clone, 'Spaces' (still in beta)
Bonus episode 15: The true truth of pre-registration
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, March 15) "128: How do you generate new research ideas?", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U79NW
-
127: Speak up or shut up?
1 maart 2021 · 51 min
We discuss when is the right time in your academic career to begin speaking up to critique your research field or whether the risk of retaliation means you should shut up and keep your head down. This was a recorded Clubhouse chat, which includes some audience interaction at the end. Lees meer
Links and details:
Moin Syed's blogpost, which was the inspiration for this topic
The 'proper' letter to the editor critique vs. a social media critique
What about retaliation for speaking out?
Differences between industry and academia
Thank you to Yan, Louis, Evan for their contribitions to our chat!
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
-
126: The division of scientific labor (with Saloni Dattani)
15 februari 2021 · 52 min
We have a wide-ranging chat with Saloni Dattani (Kings College London and University of Hong Kong) about the benefits of dividing scientific labor, the magazine she co-founded (Works in Progress) that shares novel ideas and stories of progress, and fighting online misinformation Lees meer
Here are some links and other stuff we cover
Follow Saloni on Twitter: https://twitter.com/salonium
Why Saloni started the Works in Progress magazine
[Overleaf](overleaf.com), for writing papers in LaTeX
How science will benefit from the division of labour
Public writing vs. scientific writing
Why has behavioral science not been very useful in curbing the pandemic?
A paper suggested a link between digit ratio (2D:4D) and sex differences in COVID fatalities, and another paper debunking this claim
A paper suggesting baldness is a coronavirus risk factor, without controlling for age
Should peer-review be abolished altogether? Paper link
The Japanese mathematician who solved an "impossible" conjecture and posted the papers on his website
Reforms are more likely by work by chipping away at smaller problems, rather trying to fix everyting
Google dataset search https://datasetsearch.research.google.com/
The COVIDfaq.co website
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Buy our Merch here: https://everything-hertz-podcast.creator-spring.com/
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). …
-
125: Upon reasonable request
1 februari 2021 · 47 min
Dan has a blue-sky proposal to increase data sharing—that funders mandate scholars to store and analyse data on their servers for which the funder decides what constitutes a reasonable data request (among other benefits) Lees meer
Other stuff covered:
We return with part 2 of "overrated/underrated/appropately rated", in which James throws nouns at Dan and he responds with whether these things are overrated, underrated, or appropately rated.
Joe Hilgard's blog post
Dan' proposal that funders should require all funded researchers to store and perform their analysis on a central server, which would make it easier to share data, and then the funder could decide what "upon reasonable request" means, not the reseacher or the instution
Long term vs. short term reform efforts
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, February 1) "125: Upon reasonable request ", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HR5JA
-
124: From Ptolemy to Takeshi's Castle
18 januari 2021 · 51 min
We discuss under which circumstances retracting decades-old articles is worth the time. We also chat about why LinkenIn is underrated (yes, really) and special journal issues are overrated. Lees meer
A more specific list of topics and links:
We play a game of "overated/underated", in which Dan has a list of stuff that he asks James whether these things are overrated or underated (or appropiated rated)
Why LinkedIn is underated
Graphical abstracts are underrated
Online conferences are underrated
Authors should have the chance to wildly speculate (as long as it's marked as wild speculation)
Sourdough bread is so gorgeous that even hipsters can't ruin it
Special journal themes are overrated
Should we bother putting the energy into retracting old studies?
The retracted article that Eysenck co-authored, entitled “Coffee-Drinking and Personality as Factors in the Genesis of Cancer and Coronary Heart Disease”
THIS is Takeshi's Castle
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, January 18) "124: From Ptolemy to Takeshi's Castle", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DG3PY
-
123: Authenticated anonymity (with Michael Eisen)
4 januari 2021 · 54 min
Part two of our chat with Michael Eisen (eLife Editor-in-Cheif), in which we discuss the pros and cons of collaborative peer review, journal submission interfaces, Michael's take on James' proposal that peer reviewers should be paid $450 dollars, why negative comments on peer reviews need to be normalised, plus much more. Lees meer
Some more details:
The pros and cons of collaborative peer review (in which all peer reviewers discuss the paper after all individual peer reviews have been submitted
How technology can constrain journal operations
The strange engineered delay in paper reviews (I doesn't take 2-3 weeks to review a paper)
Michael's proposal for a system in which people can nominate they have time in the near future to review a paper and then papers can be sent to them so they're rapidly reviewed
Journal submission interfaces
Michael's take on paying peer reviewers
Who owns peer reviews?
Would negative (anonomous or not) comments on an open peer review report penalise authors in the future?
Every paper gets negative peer-review comments, this doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad paper
Michael proposes an explicit "speculation" section for papers, where authors get free reign to basically say whatever they want
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Special Guest: Michael Eisen.
-
122: Reoptimizing scientific publishing for the internet age (with Michael Eisen)
21 december 2020 · 40 min
The internet should have transformed science publishing, but it didn't. We chat with Michael Eisen (Editor-in-Chief of eLife) about reoptimizing scientific publishing and peer review for the internet age. Lees meer
Here what we cover and some links:
How Michael co-founded PLOS
The book Dan mentioned on the history of the scientific journal
Why did eLife launch? What did it offer that other journals didn't?
Nature's recently proposed $11k article processing fee proposal
eLife's new "author-driven publishing" approach, in which all submitted papers have to be posted as preprints
Part two of our conversation will be released on January 4, 2021
Other links
Dan [on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
James [on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
Everything Hertz [on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
Everything Hertz [on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Our merch store, with mugs, shirts, hoodies + more
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
One dollar a month: a twenty percent discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- Five dollars a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, December 21) "122: Reoptimizing scientific publishing for the internet age (with Michael Eisen)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/USYFC
Special Guest: Michael Eisen.
-
121: Transparent peer review
7 december 2020 · 58 min
Dan and James discuss the pros and cons of transparent peer-review, in which peer review reports are published alongside manuscripts, as a keynote feature at the recent Munin Conference on scholarly publishing. Lees meer
Here's what they cover and some links:
Watch the video of this episode on the Everything Hertz YouTube page
What is transparent peer-review?
The permanancy of open peer review reports
CLOCKSS provides a sustainable dark archive to ensure the long-term survival of Web-based scholarly content
Open peer reviews provide additional info for historians
What changes when you know that your review is going to be public?
A Motte-and-bailey castle
An update and summary of the 450 movement
Involving patients/user representatives in the peer review and disemination process
The GRIM test
What about the publication of peer review reports for papers that are rejected?
The mega-analysis paper that Dan and James were co-authors on
Thank you to the organisers of the Munin conference for the invitation!
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
One dollar a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- Five dollars a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, December 7) "121: Transparent peer review", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/S2948
-
120: How false beliefs spread in science (with Cailin O'Connor)
16 november 2020 · 47 min
Dan and James chat with Cailin O'Connor (University of California, Irvine) about the how false beliefs spread in science and remedies for this issue Lees meer
Here's what they cover:
Why should psychologist scientists learn about the philosophy of science?
Cailin's new preprint on error propogation that she co-authrored
Boyd and Richerson's "Culture and the Evolutionary Process" book
Episode 91 with Kristin Sainani that discussed magnitude based inference
Christie Aschwanden on Magnitude Based Inference
The Misinformation age, co-authored by Cailin
Cailin's paper on the retraction of scientific papers
With Scite, you can be alterted whether a given paper has been retracted
Where should you start if you're interested in the philosophy of science?
Science as social knowledge, by Helen Longino
Cailin's on Twitter and you should also check out her website
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, November 16) "120: How false beliefs spread in science (with Cailin O'Connor", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/6S8TB
Special Guest: Cailin O'Connor.
-
119: Rules of thumb
2 november 2020 · 57 min
Dan and James discuss how rules of thumbs in science, such as those often applied to sample sizes and effect sizes, lead to mindless research evaluation. Lees meer
More info and links:
Is there any justifcation for holding back the public posting of data becuase you're not done with your analyses
We have a new episode partner, Scite!
Scite helps researchers quickly see how a research paper has been cited and if it has been supported or disputed by subsequent research
Get a 30% discount on a 12-month Premium Scite subscription. Use the coupon code: HERTZ (offer expires January 1, 2021)
Lake Wobegon, were all the children are above average
The tweet from Marco Altini about his desk-rejected manuscript
Sample size rules-of-thumb
Effect size rules-of-thumb
Dan's effect size distribution paper (Here's the preprint if you don't have access to the paywalled version)
We have a live episode scheduled for the 18 November (4pm CET) as part of the Munin Conference on Scholarly Publising
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, November 2) "119: Rules of thumb", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UMXR7
-
118: Evidence-free gatekeeping
19 oktober 2020 · 1 uur 5 min
Dan and James answer audio listener questions on the worst review comments they've received (and how the responded), their thoughts on the current state of preprints, and how institutional prestige influences researcher evaluations. Lees meer
Other points and links:
Send in your audio question at our website
Listen to our episode with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti, on memes, TikTok, and science communication
The worst peer reviewers we have received
How do we respond to bad peer review comments
The Research Square preprint server
The current state of preprints
The 'readiness scale' paper at Nature Human Behavior
How the prestige of one's institition affects how they are assessed
The mathematician Grigori Perelman, who declined the Fields medal
The Laboratory Life book
Double-blinded peer-review
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, October 19) "118: Evidence-free gatekeeping", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RAVXK
-
117: How we peer-review papers
5 oktober 2020 · 1 uur 5 min
Dan and James choose a preprint and walk through how they would peer-review it. James also provides an update on his recent proposal that scientists should be paid for performing peer reviews for journals published by for-profit companies Lees meer
Specific links and topics:
An update on the 450 movement, which proposes that scientists should be paid for performing peer reviews for journals published by for-profit companies
You should follow Overly Honest Editor on Twitter
The Volkswagen fellowships
Emma Mills, from Lancaster University, asks us how we review papers
We review this paper: "Direct perception of other people’s heart rate"
The tweet from Maarten van Smeeden on data simulation
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, October 5) "117: How we peer-review papers", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7JHFP
-
116: In my opinion
21 september 2020 · 1 uur 17 min
Dan and James chat about a recent twitter discussion on open science funding and the benefits of Editors sharing their opinions online. James also shares three project proposals that he thinks deserves funding, which Dan ranks. Lees meer
Other stuff...
The Twitter thread from Tage Rai on conflicts of interest in funding on science
The Raytheon Amphitheater at Northeastern University
How Nature Human Behavior evaluates your mansucripts, from episode 105.
Good and bad experiences with Frontiers journals
A contract for getting paid for reviews
Get access to our Patreon newsletter
The peer-review process at eLife
James' three grant proposal ideas
The taxi story [Story in Norwegian but Google translate does a good enough job]
PsycoPy
The eyetracker that's 100x cheaper than commercial eyetrackers
Ads in R package load up messages
Chat about this episode on the Git Gud Science Discord server
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, September 21) "116: In my opinion", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WT46Z
-
115: A modest proposal
7 september 2020 · 1 uur
We discuss James' recent proposal that scientists should be paid for performing peer review for journals published by for-profit companies—$450, to be precise. Dan also puts forward three meta-science projects that he thinks are worth funding. Lees meer
More details
James' tweet proposing peer review should be compensated
Since recording this episode, James has set up the @450Movement twitter account
Also see James' blog post
The Collabra Psychology journal
Did the folks that co-authored the "redefine statistical sigificance" paper actually go on to follow their own recommendations?
Would high financial compensation of people on job search panels lead to better quality hires?
A tool that would automatically scrape the email addresses the of authors of papers you cite would make life easier for asking for feedback and providing review recommendations.
I'm curious as to whether people are reading the show notes. If you are reading this and want a Hertz mug, the first person to send @hertzpodcast a tweet saying they read the show notes will get a free mug
Kristoffer Magnusson's statstics art
Join the Git Gud Science Discord by following this link: https://discord.gg/s8MN3gA
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
- Save 16% on either tier if you pay annually!
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, September 7) "115: A modest proposal", Everything Hertz [A…
-
114: Diversity in science (with Jess Wade)
17 augustus 2020 · 54 min
We chat with Jess Wade (Imperial College London) about diversity issues in science, including her work increasing the profile of underrepresented scientists on Wikipedia and on getting more young women into science. Lees meer
Here's what we cover:
Jess' Wikipedia page
Inferior, by Angela Saini
What's involved when making a bio page?
The "notability" criteria for adding a scientist's bio on wikipedia
Listen to Wikipedia grow on Hatnote
Don't write your own page, even under a psuedonym.
What's the best way to get girls into science and engineering?
The lack of diversity in science award winners
Follow Jess on Twitter!
The opportunuties provided by social media
Using social media to scope out new labs
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, August 16) "114: Diversity in Science (with Jess Wade)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/A6VMU
Special Guest: Jess Wade.
-
113: Citation needed
3 augustus 2020 · 53 min
Dan and James discuss whether scientists should spend more time creating and editing Wikipedia articles. They also chat about how they read scientific articles and the heuristics they use to help decide whether a paper's worth their time. Lees meer
Here are some more details and links:
Send in your audio questions here
How does James read so much and what tips do Dan and James have for reading papers?
The Stork paper recommendation service
How James and Dan rapidly judge whether a paper is worth the time to read
The benefit of a memorable paper title
Peer review forces you to read papers carefully
James screens a few papers for further reading on the spot based on their titles
What is the role of Wikipedia in science communication and education?
Jess Wade's project advocating for better representation of female scientists on Wikipedia
Wikipedia articles vs. textbooks
Do we even need textbooks in psychology?
The Biological Psychology wiki textbook is a ghost town
Using the R bookdown package for online books
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, August 3) "113: Citation needed", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3D6YJ
-
112: Leaving academia
27 juli 2020 · 51 min
Dan and James chat about James' new industry job, why he quit academia, the biggest differences between academia and industry, and why it's crucial for early career researchers to have a plan B. Lees meer
James new industry job
James' medium blog post
Having a plan B (and plan C) in academia
Using consulting a bridge to a full-time industry job
How to get an industry job
The role of grant success in academia
More research is now open access than not
Get 20% off our merch by using the promo code "AUGUST"
It's now easier to not be employed in academia but still contribute to academia
The NBA bubble
The Oura ring
Differences in work/life balance between academia and industry
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Cite this episode
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, July 27) "112: Leaving academia", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DAZ7S
-
111: The cumulative advantage of academic capital (with Chris Jackson)
6 juli 2020 · 1 uur
We chat with Chris Jackson (Imperial College, London) about the "Matthew Effect" in academia, how we can improve work/balance, and whether we should stop citing shitty people. Lees meer
Here's more stuff we cover:
Chris climbed the world's most dangerous volcano for a BBC show
Chris' email signature
Having a code of conduct for your lab
Work/life balance in academia
Are things worse in academia compared to other desk jobs?
How Chris co-founded "EarthArxiv", a preprint server for the earth sciences
The point/counterpoint article format (here is an example)
Open science in the geosciences
Requesting data from authors
Follow Chris on Twitter
Issues with bibliometrics
Should we stop citing shitty people?
The long wait to get your work expenses reiumbursed
Other links
Dan on twitter
James on [twitter]((https://twitter.com/jamesheathers)
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on [Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Cite this episode
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, July 6) "111: The cumulative advantage of academic capital (with Chris Jackson)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KJ76G
Special Guest: Chris Jackson.
-
110: Red flags for errors in papers
15 juni 2020 · 47 min
We answer a listener question on identifying red flags for errors in papers. Is there a way to better equip peer-reviewers for spotting errors and suspicious data? Lees meer
More details and links...
We answer an audio question from Kim Mitchell.
Submit your audio questions via our website
Nick Brown's blogpost on the video game "study"
We ran a live survey using Prolific! Go to prolific.com/everythinghertz to get $50 worth of credit for $1
Spotting unlikely data in meta-analysis
How can make reviewers better at detecting errors in papers?
Using a "Red team" to pull apart your papers
What do lay people think really happens in peer review?
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Buy our merch from our online store! We've got hats, mugs, hoodies, shirts + more
Cite this episode
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, June 15) "110: Red flags for errors in papers", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VTYNG
-
109: Open scientific publishing [Live episode]
1 juni 2020 · 52 min
Dan and James recorded a live episode on open publishing as part of the Open Publishing Fest. They also ran a survey (from start to finish) during the course of the episode on the public's perception of open scientific publishing and discuss the results. Lees meer
Here are more stuff they covered, plus links!
The Open Publishing Fest
We collected data LIVE thanks to Prolific! Go to prolific.co/everythinghertz to get $50 worth of credit for just $1
How to build a low cost book scanner
A prepreprint repository for African researchers
What is the role of "niche" preprint servers vs. general preprint servers?
Is there a discoverability crisis?
Detailed literature search is HARD
The Octopus publishing platform
We discuss the results of our real-time survey on the public's perception of open publishing
Some university have set up a 'data office', to which data requests are sent to (instead of the author). Is this a good idea?
Are people really doing that many coronavirus studies?
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
We have a Merch store too, where you can pick up some Hertz gear.
Cite this episode
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, June 1) "109: Open scientific publishing [live episode]", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/AT2XH
-
108: Requiem for a Screen
18 mei 2020 · 48 min
We discuss the recent claim that screen time is more harmful than heroin and whether psychological science is a crisis-ready discipline Lees meer
Other stuff we cover:
Dan's adjustment to a second kid
The "Psychological science is not yet a crisis ready discipline" preprint
The Twitter thread from Rickard Carlsson
There is a contimuum of evidence for psychological science's use in a crisis
Belgian Officials: To Save Country's Potato Industry, Belgians Must Eat More Fries
Our episode with Amy Orben
Screen time has apparenty worse effects than heroin use on wellbeing
Are we better off without press releases?
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, May 18) "108: Requiem for a screen", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BCKMS
-
107: Memes, TikTok, and science communication (with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti)
4 mei 2020 · 1 uur 5 min
We chat with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti (Chapman University, USA) about the role of memes and emerging social media in communicating science and statistics. Lees meer
Stuff we cover + links:
Why Chelsea uses memes and social media for science communication
Chelsea's use of TikTok
Chelsea's TikTok profile
Chelsea's Instagram profile
How much time should you spend on science communication vs. science research?
What Twitch is and how this can be used by academics
Chelsea's Twitch profile
Dan's livestream of him writing a paper
Chelsea's profile on YouTube
Custom Stats themed Quiplash Game Codes: (JNL-HWDN) (DJM-ZDES)
Is Instagram worth it for Science communication?
NeuralNetMemes: https://instagram.com/neuralnetmemes/?hl=en
Have statistical software packages become too easy?
Chelsea's statisical consultancy service
brms package in R (bayesian regression): https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/brms/index.html
The JASP stats package
The Phantom Tollbooth book
The lady tasting tea book
Other links
Chelsea on twitter
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, May 4) "107: Memes, TikTok, and science communication (with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], Retrieved from https://osf.io/8dywb/
Special Guest: Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti.
-
106: Science on the run
20 april 2020 · 50 min
Dan and James discuss whether getting rapid outcomes to address the pandemic is worth the increased risk of mistakes—how can researchers perform research that is both urgent and accurate? Lees meer
Here's other stuff they discuss...
Whiskey as a hobby
James' pandemic tips
How publication practices have changed during the pandemic
The news article that stated bioRxiv papers are peer-reviewed
Peer review during a pandemic
The impact of the corona virus on employment in academia
Bad peer-reviewed studies do more damage than bad preprints
Preprints that require permission for citation
Is there a need for the rapid dissemination of psych research, at the risk of making errors?
Hertz merchandise
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, April 20) "106: Science on the Run)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], Retrieved from https://osf.io/7ydvz/
-
105: Tell it like it is (with Marike Schiffer)
6 april 2020 · 58 min
We chat with Marike Schiffer, who is a Senior Editor at Nature Human Behavior, about her journal's push to increase reproducibility in the behavioral sciences. She also shares how her team evaluates manuscripts and some common misunderstandings about scientific publishing. Lees meer
Here's what else we cover:
Marike's experiencing making the switch from researcher to full-time editorial work
The day-to-day tasks of an editor
The Manifesto for reproducible science
Why has Nature Human Behavior made such a big push towards reproducibility
The benefits of transparent peer review comments
The importance of posting rich datasets
Transparency in how journals deal with manuscripts
The Editorial describing how Nature Human Behavior deals with manuscripts
The future of scientific publishing
Audio versions of papers
Two common misunderstanding that scientists have about scientific publishing
Dan's synthetic data paper
Other links
Marike on twitter
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, April 6) "105: Tell it like it is (with Marike Schiffer)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U9QRN, Retrieved from https://osf.io/u9qrn/
Special Guest: Marike Schiffer.
-
104: Now we'll discover which meetings could've been emails
16 maart 2020 · 1 uur 3 min
Dan and James discuss the COVID-19 pandemic and how it's impacting academia Lees meer
Other things they discuss:
Roy and HG's gymnastics commentary from the Sydney 2000 olympics
News tickers and collective anxiety
How will cancelled talks and events influence our careers?
Use the promo code "everythinghertz" to get $50 in free Prolific credit that you can use to recruit online participants for your next study, more details here
Using ‘Second Life’ for conferences
Tools for working from home
"It’s just a cough" skit
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, March 2) "Now we'll discover which meetings could've been emails", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DHGR6, Retrieved from https://osf.io/dhgr6/
-
103: Swiping right
2 maart 2020 · 1 uur 17 min
Dan and James discuss rejection in academia and emerging science communication mediums. Here are a few links and other things they cover: Lees meer
The main university of Sydney bar has closed because all the youth are playing Fortnite and on TikTok
How should you respond to rejection?
The rejected paper on fasting during Ramadan and cognitive control
What if there was Tinder for manuscript submission?
Josh’s tweet about citations in Wikipedia
Grant lotteries
The Steven Bradbury reference
The use of TikTok for science communication
Dan and James argues about whether blogs or twitter threads are better
Disney princesses
The Corona virus and preprints
Using instagram for scicomm
Should twitter remove the ‘likes’ and follower counts?
Billie Eilish sampling the sound traffic lights make in Sydney
The Boston train pigeon
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, March 2) "Swiping right", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/5XR2F, Retrieved from https://osf.io/5xr2f/
-
102: Master of none
17 februari 2020 · 1 uur 4 min
Should research scientists build their knowledge and skillset broadly at the risk of being a master of none? Dan and James discuss this, along with a recent editorial on the use of Twitter in academia. Lees meer
Here's other stuff they cover:
Some tools that Dan's using right now: BioRender, Canva, Slack, 99designs, and Notion.
Dan pre-registers a prediction
Herchandise! Use the code "EH102" to get a 20% discount on Hertz merchandise (valid until March 2, 2020)
The k-index editorial
Roger Ebert's statue
James wanted a picture of this fish in the show notes, for some reason
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, February 17) "Master of none", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3A9TN, Retrieved from https://osf.io/3a9tn/
-
101: Punishing research misconduct
3 februari 2020 · 59 min
Dan and James cover a new paper which discusses whether research misconduct should be criminalised. If so, where do we draw the line and who should investigate these cases? Lees meer
Here's an episode overview and links to stuff we mentioned:
We’re a pop science podcast, apparently
Elizabeth Bik’s wikipedia page
Elizabeth’s Patreon page
The original consortium letter
The apology letter from the APS
The “love of science” tweet
How James got into science
Tal’s “science is not a jobs program” tweet
The 'Should research misconduct be criminalised?' article
Professor charged with spending $96k in grant money in strip clubs
Professor with huge taxi bill (story is Norwegian, but Google translate does a decent job). The professor has agreed to pay back all trips between home and the office (about $11,000 USD
Data From A Top Geneticist’s Lab Was Flagged To A Major UK University. It Didn’t Launch A Formal Investigation Until A Decade Later.
The inaugural “get in the sea” nomination goes to the Editorial office described in this tweet
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Get 10% off Everything Hertz merch, like mugs, stickers, shirts, and hoodies, by using the discount code "HERTZ101" at our online store. Discount code valid until February 17, 2020.
Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, …
-
100: Hundredth episode live special (with Daniel Lakens, Amy Orben, and Chris Chambers)
27 januari 2020 · 1 uur 50 min
To celebrate our 100th episode, which we video-streamed live, Dan and James were joined by three special guests: Daniel Lakens, Amy Orben, and Chris Chambers. Lees meer
Here's what they covered in this episode:
James and Dan share their favourite episodes
The power of the Twitter direct message
Daniel Lakens joins us to discuss his recent work on helping people make better statistical decisions
Can you create cross-discipline effect size guidelines?
What would Jacob Cohen say if we could bring him back to life?
Academic backup career plans
Our new partnership with Prolific
James' piece on not treating your research participants like cattle
Amy Orben joins us to discuss multiverse analysis and the Reproducibilitea community
The Latin Modern Roman font
We speak with Chris Chambers and get an update of what's happening with Registered reports
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
This episode was brought you by Prolific, who is giving away $50 to podcast listeners who want to give online sampling a go! Redeem the free credit here: https://www.prolific.co/everythinghertz
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation and permanent link
Special Guests: Amy Orben, Chris Chambers, and Daniel Lakens.
-
99: Science advocacy
6 januari 2020 · 50 min
Dan and James answer a listener question on science advocacy. Is this an activity that all scientists should do, and if so, how much advocacy work should we be doing? Lees meer
Here's other stuff they cover and links to stuff they mention:
James’ thoughts on thanksgiving
James’s hot mic tweet
The Tom Bartlett story in the Chronicle about the criminologist accused of cooking the books
The SCORE DAPRA project
A listener question from Crystal Steltenpohl: What is a scientist’s role in advocacy?
Julieanne Smolinski piece on Hollywood diets
Sunbathe your arsehole, for wellness
Dealing with bad science on Facebook
Feedback from an older episode on statistical errors in sports science
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, January 6) "Science advocacy", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/8R5ZD, Retrieved from https://osf.io/8r5zd/
-
98: Episode titles are redundant, at best (with Sophia Crüwell)
16 december 2019 · 59 min
We chat with Sophia Crüwell (Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin) about pre-registration and her recent work introducing pre-registration templates for cognitive modelling research. Lees meer
Here's what we cover and some links:
Sophia’s PhD research
Sophia’s recent preprint: Preregistration in Complex Contexts: A Preregistration Template for the Application of Cognitive Models
The first version of the pre-print titled, preregistration is redundant, at best
The updated version of the preprint titled, "Is preregistration worthwhile?"
The Bayesian Spectacles blogpost on the first version of the pre-print
Data simulation from former guest Lisa DeBruine
The latest with reproducibilitea
The cargo cult science talk
Other links
Sophia on twitter
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, December 16) "Episode titles are redundant, at best (with Sophia Crüwell)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/R942W, Retrieved from https://osf.io/r942w/
Special Guest: Sophia Crüwell.
-
97: Slow science
2 december 2019 · 1 uur 1 min
Dan and James discuss the concept of "slow science", which has been proposed in order to improve the quality of scientific research and create a more sustainable work environment. Lees meer
Here's what they cover in this episode
Thank you patrons day!
Social media algorithms reward outrage, not quality of substance
A paper on slow science from Uta Frith, which includes a proposal of publication limits
Is information overload really a problem?
The META platform for a weekly research digest
Would reducing the volume of publications really improve quality?
The working paper that simulated the quality vs. quantity question
The slow professor book https://utorontopress.com/ca/the-slow-professor-3
Michael Frank’s paper on N-best evaluation
Some institutions are now screening papers before submission to check for errors
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2019, December 2) "Slow Science", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/XEU42, Retrieved from https://osf.io/xeu42/